Sunday, July 12, 2015

Share and Share Not Alike


           Before I start getting into my East Coast Adventure 2.0, I think it wise to discuss a very recent development in the world of travel and getting around: the “sharing economy” as demonstrated by the success of Airbnb, Uber, and such apps.  

            First, what created the demand for services such as these?  What did their entrepreneurs see as opportunities? Here's how I see it:

1.     The price of taxi fares.   These can seem like highway robbery at times, in some cities more than others.    The fare of a taxi from the Sacramento Train Station to my place, for example, was just short of $50, not including the tip.   This fare, in theory at least, can be halved with a service like Uber, if you’re not caught in the high-demand periods that trigger Uber’s notorious “surge pricing”;
2.     Idle cars and idle car owners.    Why have cars just sit unused, when the time they sit, and the time their owners otherwise sit, can be used to generate revenue for themselves and a dispatch organization like Uber?   Or for that matter, a homeowner who can use the extra cash and has an extra room in his/her house can rent out that room through a service like Airbnb?  Empty, sitting cars and empty, sitting rooms equal potential revenue opportunities;
3.     The consumer, by booking through Airbnb, stays in a private home (much like a Bed and Breakfast), getting to know the owner of that home, potentially saving money over a comparable hotel, and getting to know the area on a more personal level.

            I’m all in favor of economic and technological innovation.   These two apps are certainly representative of this innovation which capitalism can breed.   For example, I was tempted to use Uber in at least a portion of my recent East Coast jaunt.    I didn’t in part, because of habit, but also because of a bit of uncertainty about the “product” I was purchasing if I go through Uber: how familiar are the drivers with the roads and the short cuts?  Will he/she need to constantly refer to a GPS app or device, or do they know the area like the back of his/her hand?   What about insurance – is there any difference between a taxicab and an Uber car in this regard, and if the car should be involved in an accident, will I be held liable in any way?   Taxis were more of a known quantity to me, and for the most part, the drivers I worked with knew where to go and how to get there.    I’ve yet to use Airbnb, so I can’t comment about that specific service.   The hotels I have stayed at, for the most part, have represented what I feel to be good values for my travel dollars – though they have had their quirks and have been far from perfect.     I’m sure that Airbnb listings may be the same way, in their own ways. 

            “Disruptive” is a word commonly used to describe the impact of these new apps.    This word is an understatement if there ever was one, as witnessed by the recent violent reaction to Uber by taxi drivers in France.   The attorney general in New York has launched an investigation into Airbnb, subpoenaing information from Airbnb in what the organization described as a fishing expedition.   A similar situation erupted in San Francisco, which led to the passing of a new city ordinance allowing for the short-term rental of rooms through services such as Airbnb.   Whether New York and other cities make a similar move remains to be seen, depending on the relative strength of the high tech lobby vs. the hospitality companies such as Hilton, et. al.  

            Taxi drivers have especially felt this disruption.    It isn’t just that Uber drivers can undercut typical taxi pricing.    Taxi drivers, and taxi companies, pay for the right to drive taxis in municipalities through the purchase of medallions, which can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars each.    When the drivers retire, they sell the medallions, which often represents a substantial part of their retirement savings.    This entire system is under threat by the Uber business model.  

            Hoteliers, similarly, see the new business model offered by Airbnb as cutting into their profits.   When one compares the offerings on Airbnb to those of a comparable quality hotel in a given locality, it’s often easy to see why – an Airbnb listing will typically not carry the same costs as a hotel room run by a business (labor, overhead, etc.).   Additionally, Airbnb has been blamed for declines in affordable housing in certain areas such as New York City, further driving up rents and forcing those unable to afford those rents out of those cities.        

            So, what to do?   Who is right in this?

            Here’s my take.  When a new technology such as Airbnb or Uber comes into existence and “goes viral”, all affected sides must be taken into consideration for there to be a smooth transition with as little impact to people’s livelihoods as possible.   The business community and markets will handle their profit drive just fine, but who is looking out for the consumers and those businesses and individuals whose livelihood will be adversely affected by this “disruption”?  Who is speaking for them?  This is typically the role of government agencies and the regulations they enforce, which in the United States is a patchwork of differing laws from state to state and city to city.    These laws are just now starting to address these technologies (see San Francisco’s response to Airbnb), and will need to continue to be addressed, with government involvement, if all sides are to get along in this transition.    

          What do you think of these new arrangements?   Please comment...
 
           
           


Saturday, July 11, 2015

Change in Approach

Allright, I have an apology to make.  I wrote checks my bandwidth and energy levels could not cash over the last two weeks. 

The entire ten days has been a constant go-go-go, for reasons I'll explain in succeeding posts.   Finding time, then, for doing daily posts has been quite the challenge.   So, my apologies. 

Intead, you will see posts dealing with various aspects of the trip, and comparisons between the two cities on those aspects.    I'll compare the transit systems, the ease in getting around without a car, the hotels I stayed at, the attractions between two cities, restaurants, and other things.   I won't be completely married to this approach, but I'm thinking this is the best to take at this time. 

As you'll see, I've got a lot to say.  Stay tuned!

Thursday, July 2, 2015

Day One - NYC - Blamin' it all on the Lights on Broadway

So begins the journey and the adventure.  The following are entries from my journal, duly edited for grammar and content.   

SFO, Terminal 3. Near Gate 64, waiting for flight 637 to NYC, due to depart at 1:10.

Took a taxi to the train station, to catch the 7:00 Capitor Corridor.   This taxi trip, for a 12 mile jaunt,  set me back $50 - no wonder Uber is gaining in popularity. Any of you cabbies or cab companies taking notes? (They’re literally getting violent over this in France!) This tells me what to do when I get back home – take the light rail, and call for a taxi or Uber a few stops before I get to the Mather Field station.   $2.50 for the light rail ride plus the cheapo trip from the station to my place - lesson hopefully valid and learned.  

The Amtrak leg of the trip, from Sacramento to Richmond,  was pleasantly uneventful. Just a bottle of water and cinnamon roll, a clear morning day in the North East Bay Area, and a few games of backgammon on my smart phone. So far, so good.  

BART was a bit, uh, CLUMSY. I got to experience that in all of its permutations in one hour – sitting with a few people, standing with a stuffed car, transferring from one train to another, pushy people who cut lines,  and riding the entire length of the line from Richmond to SFO,  all while hauling my carry-on AND my roll-aboard, which had to be checked in since it was too big for the sizing models United uses.  By the way, as a tip, the airlines are tightening up their enforcement of the baggage-size limits – an argument for using the Rick Steves no-rollers backpack if your back and shoulders will allow for it.) Right now, you can’t ask for better weather, even with the little bits of haze that graced the San Francisco Hills.

I arrived at SFO, about three hours before my departure.  A pastiche of races, colors, ages, dress styles pass me by and come towards me as I angle my way toward my gate, and taking the escalators up and down to the check-in point. I have pre-TSA clearance, so I was surprised to see that so many other people did, as well. The security lines are more lax for those flyers with this clearance - no taking off of your belt, and you can leave your shoes on - just empty your pockets and put your carry-ons through the machine.   I discovered that my blue roll-along was too big even with all of my trying to scrunch it into its sizing model, then was directed to a wonderful lady who took my photo ID and my $25 credit card payment for the bag. This means that I’ll get to experience another part of JFK that I didn’t previously (and would rather not have to if I had my way about it) – the baggage claim area. A new route to the Jamaica station Airtrain will be found in this way, as well.

The flight itself was delayed by two hours, due to an issue with the pilot being unavailable and United having to call a last-minute replacement.   Now, just as a suggestion - when an airline screws up like this, would it not behoove them to compensate the inconvenienced passengers?    Nothing fancy - just some small token of appreciation in the form of a travel voucher, points on the mileage plan, or some other goodie, would be a nice gesture at these times.    In the meantime, I did what most people would do during those wait times: I ate very expensive airport food.    That's how they get you.  

Because of this little inconvenience, I called the hotel and told them that I was going to be late checking in because of my flight.   The Hotel Pennsylvania was gracious enough to pre-register me, so I kept my room.    (This is another tip I suggest, in case you're caught in the same situation).  

The flight itself was uneventful, which is always a good thing.    The entertainment options - movies, TV Shows, music, etc - were all complimentary and available to each seat through the touch screens.  I checked out two episodes of the Foo Fighters' excellent series (don't miss it!).    But I've got a beef with gogoinflight.com.    Their rates for inflight WiFi have skyrocketed to the completely unreasonable.   For this jaunt, 30 minutes of on-line time would have set me back $10, and I would have had to pay $34 for access for the entire flight.   Unless I'm writing it off to an expense account, I'd have to be absolutely CRAZY to bite at those absurd rates, especially when they were considerably cheaper not too many years ago.   Gogoinflight.com can eat it, as far as I'm concerned.  

We landed at 11:30 EST, waited an average amount of time for the luggage to drop down into the Terminal 7 carousel, and started out toward the Airtrain to Jamaica Station.   The walk was not nearly as long as my prior trip (or at least, didn't seem as long).   The Airtrain fare, payable at the end of the journey, is $5.   I paid this, with my $2.50 subway fare and $1 surcharge, hopped on the E train, and began my 45 minute journey to the 34th street station.  

I arrived at 1:15am,  got into the room, set up shop, and slept for the next four or so hours (I lost count, I was so brain dead).   

I've got more tomorrow, on the Museum of Modern Art, the Metropolitan Museum, and a few other things.   Stay Tuned!